Reframing Suicide Beyond Psychopathology and Social Determinism
by Athanasios Komianos (Greece)
Abstract: Contemporary models of suicide are dominated by psychological and sociological frameworks that emphasize individual psychopathology, trauma, and social disintegration. While these perspectives have significantly contributed to suicide prevention and clinical intervention, they often remain insufficient for understanding suicidal ideation that emerges in existential, spiritual, and identity-related crises. This paper proposes an integrated transpersonal and regression-therapy model of suicidal ideation, suggesting that many suicidal impulses are not expressions of a genuine desire for death, but manifestations of disrupted meaning, fragmented consciousness, and unresolved experiential imprints. Drawing upon transpersonal psychology, depth psychology, and regression-therapy clinical observations, the paper reframes suicidal ideation as a crisis of identity and continuity rather than a death wish. Ethical implications, therapeutic considerations, and integrative pathways for treatment are discussed.
Keywords
Suicide, transpersonal psychology, regression therapy, suicidal ideation, trauma, soul fragmentation, existential crisis, identity collapse
Durkheim’s Theory of Suicide
When talking about suicide one has to start from the sociologist Émile Durkheim. He treated suicide not as an individual psychological act, but as a social phenomenon — something influenced by the structure and norms of society. His central idea was that suicide rates vary according to social integration and social regulation (Durkheim, 1897/1951) — that is, how well individuals are connected to their society and how much their lives are controlled or guided by social norms. He thus came up with his four types of suicide, see Table 1. I place these types in a table so it can be seen more clearly. Of course, his view is limited. In it has been superseded by a more interdisciplinary approach that takes into account not only sociological but psychological, medical and anthropological approaches. There is also a relatively new field of study called suicidology.
Table 1.
Durkheim argued that suicide is not purely an act of despair or mental illness — it reflects how well a society supports and regulates its members. He saw suicide rates as a kind of “moral thermometer” of society’s health (Durkheim, 1897/1951).
Durkheim’s framework still shapes modern sociology and psychology, especially studies on:
- The effects of social isolation (e.g. in modern digital life),
- Economic instability and loss of meaning,
- Cultural expectations and collective identity.
Suicide is rarely about wanting to die
One of the most important insights is that most suicidal people do not want death — they want the pain to stop (Shneidman, 1993). What they are actually seeking is relief, rest, silence, an end to unbearable inner tension. Death becomes imagined as a solution, not a goal.
Suicide occurs when pain exceeds meaning
A useful equation often cited in psychology textbooks is:
Suicidal risk increases when pain > hope + meaning + connection (Joiner, 2005; Frankl, 1963).
People can survive enormous suffering if they have, meaning like “this has purpose”, connection “someone sees me”, hope like “this can change.” When all three collapse simultaneously, danger rises sharply.
Suicide is not weakness — it is collapse
It is not selfishness, cowardice, moral failure. It is more accurately: a collapse of the nervous system and the meaning-making mind. It is often accompanied by chronic stress, trauma overload, emotional exhaustion, learned helplessness. At that point, rational thinking narrows drastically — known as cognitive constriction (Shneidman, 1993). The mind loses alternatives.
Psychological roots commonly involved
It could be due to depression which is emotional numbness, loss of pleasure, distorted self-perception. Or it could be due to trauma, abuse, abandonment, humiliation, cognitive distortions “I am a burden”, or emotional dysregulation. The existence of shame is also one of the strongest predictors (Tangney & Dearing, 2002). Shame and self-loathing, says: “I am the problem,” and not: “Something happened to me.” Shame isolates — and isolation kills.
Existential factors
Many suicides are rooted not only in pain, but in loss of identity, collapse of worldview, spiritual crisis, loss of meaning. Burdened people may ask questions such as:
- “Why exist at all?”
- “What is the point of continuing?”
- “Nothing matters anymore.”
This is not pathology — it is existential despair (Frankl, 1963; Yalom, 1980).
The paradox: wanting to live and wanting to die coexist
Most suicidal individuals experience one part wanting to die and the other part desperately wanting help. This inner conflict is enormous. Often the suicidal part is not saying: “I want to die.” It is saying: “I cannot live like this anymore” (Shneidman, 1993).
Suicide as a communication failure
Very often suicide is unexpressed truth with no witness. People die not because nobody cared — but because they felt, unheard, unseen, emotionally alone (Joiner, 2005). The pain becomes unspeakable and consequently silence becomes fatal.
From a transpersonal/regression-therapy lens
Many regression therapists observe that suicidal ideation may involve, unresolved trauma, inner child despair, identification with death experiences, deep unconscious guilt, pre-verbal abandonment wounds, past lives residues (Woolger, 1987; TenDam, 2014), attached spirit interferences (Komianos, 2011, 2023).
In regression work, suicidal impulses often dissolve when the original trauma is witnessed, meaning is restored and the self is reintegrated.
The wish to die probably belongs to a fragment, not the whole soul.
What protects against suicide
Research consistently shows protective factors:
- one trusted human connection
- sense of belonging
- spiritual meaning
- emotional validation
- hope for change
Even one person can be enough (Pargament, 1997).
What helps people survive suicidal crises
People should feel that they are being listened to without correction. That they are not being judged or rushed, or not being told “be positive”, or not being minimized.
The most healing phrase is often, “Given what you’ve been through, it makes sense that you feel this way (Rogers, 1961).”
Understanding reduces danger. People who survive suicide attempts often report: “I didn’t want to die. I just didn’t see another way.” This is crucial. Suicide is about tunnel vision — not truth. Suicide emerges when pain becomes unbearable, meaning collapses, connection is lost, hope disappears and when the mind narrows. On the other hand, healing begins when suffering is witnessed, meaning is gently restored, the person is not left alone.
In Plain Language
Instead of seeing suicide only as a mental health problem inside one person’s head (Table 2):
- Think of it as connected to relationships and society around them
- People are less likely to die by suicide when they feel connected, valued, and supported by others
- Prevention should not just be clinical, but also social and community-based
Table 2.
The Anthropological Perspective
The classical sociological starting point is Émile Durkheim, who viewed suicide as an indicator of social integration and social regulation. Anthropology, however, moved beyond this framework by focusing on how different cultures assign meaning to suicide, how families narrate it, how communities interpret it, and how suicide may function as protest, shame, sacrifice, communication, escape, or even a means of belonging. Anthropologists therefore emphasize that suicide must always be examined within its local cultural context rather than solely through universal psychiatric categories (Staples, 2020).
One of the central anthropological findings is that suicide does not carry the same meaning across cultures. In some societies it may be understood as personal collapse, in others as social protest, in others as a response to dishonour, loyalty to a collective ideal, or despair arising from colonialism, poverty, exclusion, or cultural disintegration. Anthropology therefore rejects the idea that suicide can be fully explained by purely individual psychological models (Münster, 2012).
Jack Douglas, in The Social Meanings of Suicide, criticized overly statistical approaches and argued that researchers should examine the social meanings attached to suicidal acts: what the individual intended to communicate, how the act is interpreted by others, and who is considered morally implicated in the event. From this perspective, suicide often functions not merely as a private ending but as a message directed toward the living.
Ethnographic studies in South Asia have demonstrated that self-destructive acts are frequently linked to kinship structures, marriage systems, gender roles, honour, family conflict, class pressures, and the inability to express suffering within hierarchical social environments. In Sri Lanka, for example, Tom Widger analysed suicide not simply as mental illness, but as an act embedded within narratives of anger, disappointment, social pressure, and familial tension.
Among Indigenous communities in Canada and other populations affected by colonialism, cultural disruption, and social marginalization, anthropologists have shown that high suicide rates cannot be understood solely through individual pathology. Ronald Niezen described cluster suicides among Indigenous youth as tragic phenomena in which suicide may become intertwined with identity, collective memory, and belonging. In such contexts, suicide can become socially imaginable through repeated exposure within the community.
Anthropological research has also demonstrated that suicide may acquire epidemic or imitative qualities when it gains cultural visibility. Suffering alone is not sufficient; there must also exist a cultural script that renders suicide conceivable as a possible response to despair. This helps explain why some communities, age groups, or geographic locations develop recurring patterns or “cultures of suicide.”
Another major contribution of anthropology is the understanding of suicide as a form of moral and social communication. In many cases, the act is directed toward someone: the family, a lover, the community, the state, ancestors, or even the divine. Suicide may therefore express accusation, shame, protest, grief, disappointment, or a desperate demand for recognition. This does not mean the act is rational or justified, but rather that it possesses social language and symbolic meaning (Münster, 2015).
Anthropologists also emphasize that culture influences not only the meaning of suicide, but also the methods, locations, timing, narratives, and emotional responses surrounding it. Cultural factors shape stigma, protective mechanisms, access to care, family silence, and the interpretation of death itself.
Research further shows that suicide frequently emerges during periods of transition and social rupture: loss of identity, economic collapse, migration, adolescence, marriage, colonial violence, cultural disintegration, or rapid modernization. In these contexts, suicide reflects not only psychic pain but also a rupture between the individual and the moral or social universe in which they live.
Anthropology therefore provides an important corrective to purely psychiatric or statistical approaches. It demonstrates that suicide is simultaneously personal Table 4.
and collective, psychological and cultural, individual and historical (Goldsmith, 2002). It is not enough to ask only “What disorder did the person have?” One must also ask: “What social pressures surrounded them?”, “What meanings did death hold within their culture?”, “Who listened or failed to listen to their suffering?”, “What collective traumas existed?”, and “What cultural narratives made suicide appear conceivable?”
In conclusion, anthropological evidence suggests that suicide is deeply embedded within relationships, symbols, values, historical forces, collective memory, inequality, stigma, honour, and crises of meaning. It is never solely “inside the individual’s mind,” but also exists within the family, the community, social structures, and the wider cultural imagination.
Core Regression-Therapy Insight
According to some systemic therapists, suicidal impulses may not originate in the present-life adult personality. Instead, they could belong to an inner fragment, a traumatized younger self (Watkins & Watkins, 1997), a past-life identity, or an unresolved death imprint. In other words, the adult ego is hosting the impulse — not generating it.
Inner Child Trauma could involve feelings of abandonment, humiliation, chronic emotional neglect, and being unwanted. The child could come up with statements such as, “My existence causes pain.” Later expressed as: “Everyone would be better without me” (Bradshaw, 1990).
Clients may carry frozen death imprints or memories of violent death, or despair at the moment of dying, or the false belief that death equals peace. The “Escape through death” theme is a plain myth. Healing does not occur by leaving the body — but by inhabiting it safely. Several transpersonal and near-death researchers propose that consciousness may persist beyond bodily death experiences (Greyson, 2003; Moody, 1975) along with the vast majority of regression therapists.
In regression therapy, traumatic experiences are often understood as events that fragment the psyche (Janet, 1907/1973; Van der Kolk, 2014; Wright, 2014). During moments of overwhelming terror, helplessness, despair, or emotional shock, aspects of consciousness may separate or “split off” in an attempt to preserve survival. These fragmented parts frequently remain psychologically frozen (Levine, 1997) within the emotional reality of the original trauma, continuing to carry feelings of fear, hopelessness, exhaustion, shame, or panic long after the event itself has passed. From this perspective, these wounded aspects of the self are not truly seeking death; rather, they are seeking recognition, rescue, completion, and liberation from unresolved suffering.
One of the most important therapeutic observations in regression work is that suicidal ideation is often experienced not as a genuine wish for annihilation, but as the resurfacing of an unresolved state of consciousness connected to past trauma. The impulse toward self-destruction may therefore reflect frozen emotional imprints, unresolved despair, or identification with traumatic memories that continue to live within the psyche. The therapeutic task is not simply the suppression of symptoms, but the compassionate recognition and witnessing of these wounded states so they may finally be understood, processed, and integrated.
Healing frequently occurs when the fragmented aspect is located and the original context of the suffering is revealed. As the individual revisits the source of the trauma, the illusion that there was “no escape” often begins to dissolve. Perspective gradually returns, emotional meaning becomes clearer, and the psyche regains its capacity for choice. Clients often describe a profound realization during this process, expressing the feeling that the despair or destructive impulse was not truly part of their essential identity. Many state with great emotional relief: “It’s not mine. It never was.”
Regression therapy therefore approaches healing as a process of reintegration rather than repression. The goal is to restore continuity within the psyche and reconnect the individual with a wider sense of self, meaning, and emotional freedom. As awareness expands, the person is no longer trapped within the emotional reality of the original trauma, but begins to experience renewed agency, perspective, and inner stability.
At the same time, it is essential to emphasize an important ethical boundary. Regression therapy does not interpret suicide as spiritually justified, karmically required, or as a desirable “return home.” Rather, suicidal ideation is understood as an expression of profound suffering and misidentified consciousness (Assagioli, 1971; Grof, 1985) — a symptom of unresolved psychological pain requiring compassionate therapeutic attention. The aim of therapy is always the restoration of stability, reconnection with life, reintegration of fragmented aspects of the self, and the recovery of the individual’s ability to make conscious and meaningful choices.
Spiritual and Paranormal Aspects of Suicide: Why Do People Commit Suicide in Specific Locations?
“A person will spasmodically jump to his or her death from the top of a building, and it is only later that it is discovered that many similar accidents had happened at the exact same point on the road, or that particular building was infamous for its many suicides.”
Seizan Fukami (1992)
I will start here with the country of the “Rising Sun”, Japan. It was the Japanese Mystic, Seizan Fukami who opened my eyes on this idea in his book Exorcism. It seems that in this country the tradition has historically high suicide rates, peaking in 2003 with 34,427 deaths, often tied to economic hardship (Okada, 2024). While once viewed as a private issue, suicide is now treated as a public health crisis. The government promotes awareness through hotlines, signs, and training for forest workers to identify distressed visitors. But there are some places more favourable for suicide than others, why?
Aokigahara – The “Suicide Forest” at the Foot of Mount Fuji
Origins and Geography
Aokigahara, known in Japan as Jukai (“Sea of Trees”), is a dense forest that grew on the hardened lava field left by Mount Fuji’s massive eruption in 864 CE. Located in Yamanashi Prefecture, it is both a popular hiking destination and, tragically, a site associated with suicide.
Historical and Cultural Roots
Although direct historical links remain uncertain, some researchers have noted that Japan’s sacred forests and mountain regions were historically associated with ascetic Buddhist practices involving prolonged fasting, isolation, and ritualized approaches toward death, including the phenomenon of sokushinbutsu or self-mummification (Lobetti, 2014). Such traditions may have contributed culturally to later symbolic associations between forests, death, spiritual liminality, and self-sacrifice within Japanese folklore and collective imagination.
Modern Association with Suicide
In the 20th century, Aokigahara became widely recognized as a suicide site, reinforced by two cultural phenomena:
- 1960: Seicho Matsumoto’s short story “Tower of Waves” portrayed a woman walking into Aokigahara to die.
- 1993: Wataru Tsurumi’s controversial book “The Complete Suicide Manual” described Aokigahara as “the perfect place to die,” complete with directions and methods.
Between 2013–2015, over 100 suicides were recorded there. In response, the Japanese government stopped releasing statistics to reduce copycat cases.
Media Influence and Misrepresentation
International media and social platforms, particularly after Logan Paul’s 2018 video, sensationalized Aokigahara as a macabre or “haunted” forest. This has distorted Western views, conflating it with romanticized or ritualized suicide imagery from samurai and wartime narratives.
Present Reality
Despite its reputation, Aokigahara is also a beautiful and serene natural area, featuring lava caves, trails, and scenic landscapes. Visitors describe it as quiet and peaceful rather than eerie. It remains both a symbol of Japan’s struggle with mental health and a place of natural wonder and reflection.
Aokigahara in the Movie Industry
Here is the snapshot of the movie A Sea of Trees which deals with the issue of suicide in Aokigahara. According to Wikipedia at its May 2015 debut at the Cannes Film Festival, the film was met with harsh critical reception; it was loudly booed and laughed at by an audience of critics, with critic Scott Foundas calling it a film “for nobody.” Some critics were more impressed by the film; Pete Hammond wrote “Their film deserves a better fate” and he praised its “pared sentimentality.”
Unfortunately, people cannot accept and consistently reject the idea that disembodied consciousness can sometimes interact and affect physical reality. The poetic license of director Gus Van Sant was placed to the pyre of materialism and condemned as a distasteful joke.
Here I cannot resist posting two cases from my book Unveiling Spiritual Intrusions (Komianos, 2023) that will illuminate some paranormal and transpersonal aspects of suicide.
Helen was the wife of an Albanian worker, George, who renovated my office in Corfu. After months of hard work, George and I got to know each other well and became friends. Not long after I opened my office, I heard about something quite horrific. George’s wife, Helen, woke up early one morning, walked through the centre of Corfu town and went towards the castle city walls near the old fortress. She climbed the rails and then jumped down from the considerable height. She survived, but with major injuries to her body. Surgeons had an uphill task to repair the damage. She remained in a deep coma for three months, and after waking up she needed multiple operations just to be able to walk a bit. Now she can walk only with support and cannot work or live on her own.
Not being a citizen of Corfu, I had no idea that at that specific spot, dozens of people have committed suicide over the decades. Why did people choose this particular spot along a wall that stretches for hundreds of meters and attains greater height elsewhere? I assume that Helen, being Albanian, was not aware of this fact either. Her husband told me that on that morning he was feeling lethargic and could not wake up and get out of bed. He saw Helen when she woke up, and she looked as though she was mesmerized. She walked out of the house, wearing the same shorts she had been sleeping in and her slippers. Her husband was unable to react physically in any way; he was powerless.
Helen’s psychiatric history was not very clear. Other family members suffered from depression and suicidal tendencies, but none had gone so far as to try. The focus of this story is not on the attempt to take her own life, but on the conditions under which it was attempted and the selection of the particular spot.
Famous landmarks around the world have become known for high incident rates of suicide; some are so high that numerous signs have been posted, urging potential victims to seek help.
Another excerpt of my book concerns a peculiar story that took place and made the national news in 2017 that took place in my hometown but in a specific house:
In June 1997, an 18-year-old girl from Nikaia learned that she had failed two tests in the Panhellenic examinations. A few hours after she was informed by a classmate, she took a backpack and left her house. After wandering around for hours, around 12:30 on June 18, she arrived at 23 Zirinis Street in Kifissia. She rang the bell of the unknown apartment on the 4th floor and asked the then tenant to let her in to wash her bloody hands. Unsuspecting, the 70-year-old man allowed her to enter his house, but she did not go to the bathroom, but through an open door she went out to the balcony and committed suicide. The residents of the apartment building alerted the authorities, and the girl was taken to the emergency room, admitted to the operating room but at 15:00, the same day she succumbed to her injuries. The balcony from which the 18-year-old girl then took the plunge to her death is the same as the one from which the 6-year-old fell on Saturday February 11, 2017, when his mother’s attention was distracted.
Now could that be a coincidence? Someone might wonder who ‘brought’ the disappointed girl in this apartment in the first place, so far from her hometown? And then should ask who ‘pushed’ the little boy off the specific balcony twenty years after the first incident?
The Wandering Soul: Esoteric Views on Suicide and the Afterlife
It should be more than evident that the following perspectives represent metaphysical, spiritual, and esoteric interpretations of suicide and postmortem consciousness rather than empirically verified scientific conclusions. However, all the more cases spring up that we have to address this important spiritual aspect of suicide.
Across esoteric, occult, metaphysical, and transpersonal traditions, suicide has rarely been viewed simply as the termination of biological life. Instead, it is often interpreted as a profound interruption in the natural evolution of consciousness. Although interpretations differ widely among traditions, several recurring themes emerge: shock and disorientation after death, attachment to the earthly plane, unresolved emotional states, karmic continuation, and eventually the possibility of healing and reintegration.
Many esoteric systems propose that after a self-inflicted death the soul may initially experience confusion or disorientation (Swedenborg, 2006). Because consciousness survives bodily death in these traditions, the individual is believed to awaken into a nonphysical state carrying the same emotional pain, despair, or mental condition present at the moment of death. Thus, suicide is not seen as an escape from suffering, but rather as a continuation of unresolved consciousness into another dimension of experience. Some traditions describe the soul as remaining temporarily “earthbound,” especially when powerful emotions such as guilt, fear, anger, grief, shame, or attachment are present.
In Spiritualistic and mediumistic literature, souls who die by suicide are often described as existing in a state of emotional shock or self-imposed isolation until they gradually understand their condition. Authors such as Allan Kardec suggested that suffering after suicide is not divine punishment but the natural psychological consequence of carrying unresolved pain into the afterlife. Similarly, many trance mediums and clairvoyants describe souls lingering near the place of death, near loved ones, or within familiar environments because they cannot fully detach from earthly identity.
Theosophical and occult teachings frequently describe suicide as creating a disturbance within the natural rhythm of incarnation. According to these systems, human life unfolds according to lessons, karmic patterns, and opportunities for spiritual growth. Ending life prematurely does not erase these lessons but postpones or complicates them.
The soul may therefore undergo a prolonged period of review, healing, and reorientation before continuing its evolutionary journey. Nevertheless, most esoteric traditions reject the idea of eternal damnation. Instead, they view suffering as temporary and educational rather than punitive.
In Tibetan Buddhism, the state following death is often associated with the bardo, an inter-mediate realm in which consciousness encounters visions shaped by its own mental and emotional state (Evans-Wentz, 1960). A disturbed or fearful consciousness may experience confusion and terr-ifying imagery, while a more aware consciousness may recognize these experiences as projections of mind. Suicide, in this context, is considered spiritually tragic not because it condemns the soul forever, but because it may intensify confusion and delay liberation from suffering.
Certain mystical and Gnostic traditions regard suicide as the result of profound alienation from the deeper spiritual self. The soul is believed to have incarnated for growth, learning, and awakening, and therefore self-destruction interrupts a sacred developmental process. Yet even here, compassion remains central. The soul is not eternally lost but eventually guided toward healing, understanding, and reconciliation with its deeper purpose.
Modern transpersonal and regression-oriented interpretations often echo these older themes. Most of our colleagues, report that clients who explore suicidal impulses during regression work frequently encounter unresolved trauma, fragmented emotional states, death imprints, or identities associated with despair and hopelessness. From this perspective, suicidal ideation may not reflect a true desire for annihilation but rather a desperate longing for relief, release, rest, or escape from unbearable psychological pain. Healing occurs not through death, but through integration, reconnection, and restoration of meaning (Fiore, 1987; Baldwin, 1992).
A common theme across nearly all spiritual traditions is that consciousness continues after death in some form and that unresolved suffering cannot simply be escaped through physical self-destruction. However, equally universal is the belief that compassion, healing, redemption, and spiritual growth remain possible. Even traditions that describe difficult postmortem consequences generally portray them not as eternal punishment, but as opportunities for understanding, transformation, and eventual return to wholeness (Kardec, 1975).
Modern Near-Death Experience research supports such claims. In a failed suicide the experiencer felt her body sliding downward in a cold, dark, watery environment: “When I reached the bottom, it resembled the entrance to a cave, with what looked like webs hanging…. I heard cries, wails, moans, and the gnashing of teeth. I saw these beings that resembled humans, with the shape of a head and body, but they were ugly and grotesque…. They were frightening and sounded like they were tormented, in agony.” (Bush & Greyson 2014)
Another element we should take into consideration is what happens if the persons who ended their lives remain earthbound and/or even interfere with the environment by generating poltergeist phenomena and in some cases causing fear to the inhabitants of these dwellings. There are several cases reported and dealt with (Denning, 1996; Lawrie, 2003; Ireland-Frey 1999; Robertson, 2015).
So, it should be clear from the start that these esoteric interpretations in no way can be used to romanticize suicide or to present it as spiritually desirable. Most traditions, regardless of their metaphysical framework, ultimately affirm the value of life, the importance of conscious growth, and the possibility of healing while embodied. The central message underlying these teachings is not condemnation, but compassion: suffering seeks understanding, and the soul seeks restoration rather than destruction.
Conclusion
Suicide cannot be fully understood through psychopathology or social theory alone. A transpersonal and regression-therapy perspective reframes suicidal ideation as an expression of disrupted continuity rather than a genuine wish for death. When suffering is contextualized, witnessed, and integrated, the impulse toward annihilation often transforms into a desire for relief, connection, and renewed meaning. Many esoteric and metaphysical traditions similarly suggest that consciousness survives bodily death and that unresolved suffering is not escaped through self-destruction, but carried forward until it is understood and healed. Within these traditions, suicide is frequently viewed not as a final ending, but as a tragic interruption in the soul’s developmental journey — a state of confusion, fragmentation, or spiritual disorientation requiring compassion, reconciliation, and reintegration rather than condemnation. Understanding suicide as a crisis of identity rather than a drive toward death may therefore offer clinicians a deeper and more compassionate foundation for healing, one that acknowledges both the psychological and existential dimensions of human suffering.
References
Assagioli, R. (1971). Psychosynthesis: A manual of principles and techniques. Viking Press.
Baldwin, W. J. (1992). Spirit releasement therapy. Headline Books.
Bradshaw, J. (1990). Homecoming: Reclaiming and championing your inner child. Bantam.
Bush NE, Greyson B. (2014) Distressing near-death experiences: the basics. Mo Med. 2014 Nov-Dec;111(6):486-90. PMID: 25665233; PMCID: PMC6173534.
Denning, H. (1996). True Hauntings: Spirits with a purpose. Llewellyn Publications.
Douglas, J. D. (1967). The social meanings of suicide. Princeton University Press.
Durkheim, É. (1951). Suicide: A study in sociology (J. A. Spaulding & G. Simpson, Trans.). Free Press. (Original work published 1897)
Evans-Wentz, W. Y. (Ed.). (1960). The Tibetan book of the dead (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Fiore, E. (1987). The unquiet dead. Ballantine Books.
Frankl, V. E. (1963). Man’s search for meaning. Beacon Press.
Fukami, S. (1992). Exorcism: Gateway to a new life. Shohan.
Goldsmith, S. K., Pellmar, T. C., Kleinman, A. M., & Bunney, W. E. (Eds.). (2002). Reducing suicide: A national imperative. National Academies Press.
Greyson, B. (2003). Near-death experiences in a psychiatric outpatient clinic population. Psychiatric Services, 54(12), 1649–1651.
Grof, S. (1985). Beyond the brain: Birth, death, and transcendence in psychotherapy. SUNY Press.
Grof, S., & Grof, C. (1989). Spiritual emergency: When personal transformation becomes a crisis. Tarcher.
Ireland-Frey L. (1999). Freeing the captives: The emerging therapy of treating spirit attachment. Hampton Roads Publishing.
Janet, P. (1973). Psychological healing (Vols. 1–2). Arno Press. (Original work published 1907)
Joiner, T. (2005). Why people die by suicide. Harvard University Press.
Kardec, A. (1975). The spirits’ book (A. Blackwell, Trans.). Samuel Weiser. (Original work published 1857)
Komianos A. (2023). Unveiling spiritual intrusions. Lulu Press.
Lawrie A. (2003). The Psychic investigator’s casebook, Vol. 1. 1st Books
Levine, P. A. (1997). Waking the tiger: Healing trauma. North Atlantic Books.
Lobetti, T. F. (2014). Ascetic Practices in Japanese Religion. Routledge.
Moody, R. A. (1975). Life after life. Mockingbird Books.
Münster, D. (2012). Farmers’ suicides and the state in India: Conceptual and ethnographic notes from Wayanad, Kerala. Contributions to Indian Sociology, 46(1–2), 181–208.
Niezen, R. (2009). Suicide as a way of belonging: Causes and consequences of cluster suicides in Aboriginal communities. In L. J. Kirmayer & G. G. Valaskakis (Eds.), Healing traditions: The mental health of Aboriginal peoples in Canada (pp. 178–195). UBC Press.
Okada M, Matsumoto R, Motomura E. Suicide mortality rates in Japan before and beyond the COVID-19 pandemic era. PCN Rep. 2024 Apr 1;3(2):e188. doi: 10.1002/pcn5.188. PMID: 38868081; PMCID: PMC11114309.
Pargament, K. I. (1997). The psychology of religion and coping. Guilford Press.
Robertson T.J. (2015). More things you can do when you are dead. White Crow Books.
Rogers, C. (1961). On becoming a person. Houghton Mifflin.
Shneidman, E. S. (1993). Suicide as psychache: A clinical approach to self-destructive behavior. Jason Aronson.
Siegel, D. J. (1999). The developing mind. Guilford Press.
Staples, J., Widger, T., & Osella, F. (Eds.). (2020). Suicide in South Asia: Ethnographic perspectives. Routledge.
Swedenborg, E. (2006). Heaven and hell. Swedenborg Foundation. (Original work published 1758)
Tangney, J. P., & Dearing, R. L. (2002). Shame and guilt. Guilford Press.
TenDam, H. (2012). Exploring reincarnation. Lulu Press.
TenDam H. (2014). Deep Healing and Transformation. Lulu Press.
Van der Kolk, B. A. (2014). The body keeps the score. Viking.
Watkins, J. G., & Watkins, H. H. (1997). Ego states: Theory and therapy. Norton.
Woolger, R. J. (1987). Other lives, other selves. Bantam.
Wright, P. (2014). How earthbound spirits, ghosts, demons and ETs can affect your clients and the six steps to take to release them. Journal of Regression Therapy, Is. 26, Vol. XXII, 10–30.
Yalom, I. D. (1980). Existential psychotherapy. Basic Books.



